Post-Liquidity Tax Planning and QSBS

March 11, 2026

Current as of: September 6, 2026. This article reflects legal and regulatory authorities, administrative guidance, and market practice available as of the date above. Rules, thresholds, agency guidance, and administrative practice may change after that date, and the analysis may not apply the same way to every set of facts.

By Rene Hinojosa, Principal, Hiro Law. Licensed in Texas, California, and Mexico.

For founders, family offices, and investors operating across the U.S.-Mexico corridor, post-exit tax planning is where cross-border complexity hits hardest. The period before and after a liquidity event can materially affect tax outcomes for years. A common problem is that QSBS planning, basis support, charitable planning, or installment-sale analysis begins too late to preserve the full range of available options. This Insight outlines planning frameworks that may be available, common timing problems, and cross-border issues that should generally be coordinated with both U.S. and Mexican tax counsel.

Where §1202 applies and the excluded gain falls within the applicable cap, the federal tax on the excluded portion can be 0%; where §1202 does not apply, gain is taxed under the otherwise applicable federal rules, which may include the 20% long-term capital gains rate and, for some taxpayers, the 3.8% net investment income tax. This Insight addresses the statutory framework, the consequences of late planning, and the timing constraints that apply after closing.

Key Points

Section 1202 exclusion requires prospective structuring. QSBS gain exclusion applies only to qualifying stock in a domestic C corporation. Stock acquired by the taxpayer after July 4, 2025, determined after applying IRC §1223, may qualify for the tiered three-, four-, and five-year exclusion percentages; stock acquired on or before that date generally remains subject to the prior holding-period regime. Separately, the issuer's aggregate-gross-assets ceiling is $50 million for stock issued on or before July 4, 2025, and $75 million for stock issued after that date. A business initially operated as an LLC or partnership may later incorporate, but the C corporation stock is treated as acquired on the exchange date and Section 1202 applies special fair-market-value rules to the contributed property and the shareholder's stock basis.
Test the holder’s U.S. tax status before modeling the QSBS benefit. First determine whether the gain is subject to U.S. federal income tax. Where it is not, §1202 has no U.S. tax to eliminate. For otherwise taxable eligible gain, apply the relevant exclusion tier and cap. Section 1202 does not control Mexican tax: a Mexican tax resident must separately analyze the gain under Mexican domestic rules, including basis, any applicable special regime and credit availability. An excluded U.S. gain does not create a foreign-tax credit.
QSBS amendments use different operative triggers and limit eligible gain before applying the exclusion percentage. For stock acquired by the taxpayer after July 4, 2025, determined after applying §1223, the exclusion percentage is 50% after at least three years, 75% after at least four years, and 100% after at least five years; the flat dollar component of the per-issuer eligible-gain limit is $15 million. The amount of eligible gain first is limited to the greater of that applicable dollar limit or 10 times the aggregate adjusted bases of QSBS of the issuer disposed of during the taxable year, and the applicable 50%, 75%, or 100% exclusion percentage then applies. Section 1202(b)(4) reduces the post-enactment dollar limit by specified prior-year same-issuer eligible gain and specified current-year eligible gain from same-issuer stock acquired on or before July 4, 2025. Separately, stock issued after July 4, 2025, is tested under the $75 million aggregate-gross-assets ceiling; stock issued on that date remains under the $50 million ceiling.
Non-US founders and dual structures create traps in QSBS eligibility. A corporation is domestic for Section 1202 purposes if organized in the United States; foreign ownership does not by itself impair domestic status. However, cross-border structures raise practical QSBS issues: the US corporation must independently satisfy the active business and gross assets requirements under §1202's specific subsidiary rules, and a foreign affiliate is not automatically consolidated with the US issuer merely because of common ownership.
Eligible deferred-payment sales may qualify for installment treatment. Classify each component of consideration separately: equity may be a current payment, and earnouts and notes have distinct rules. Section 453 exceptions, recapture, related-party rules and §453A interest and pledge rules can limit deferral.
Opportunity Zone investments may defer eligible gain if invested in a qualified opportunity fund within 180 days. Under the legacy regime, deferred gain is generally recognized no later than December 31, 2026, and a 10-year hold may eliminate tax on post-investment appreciation in the QOF investment, but not on the original deferred gain. For investments made after December 31, 2026, the OBBB Act replaces the fixed 2026 recognition date with a rolling 5-year inclusion rule and provides a 10% basis step-up after 5 years, enhanced to 30% for qualified rural opportunity funds.
Charitable planning depends on contribution timing and deduction requirements. A qualifying DAF contribution or CRT arrangement may provide a deduction or deferral, subject to valuation, holding period, substantiation, percentage limits and applicable 2026 rules. Assignment-of-income principles can prevent a late contribution from shifting sale gain, and the DAF sponsor controls donated assets.
Reconcile outside stock basis and inside asset basis separately. Depreciation generally reduces asset basis. A stock sale usually uses shareholder stock basis; an asset sale or qualifying election can make inside basis relevant. Purchase-price allocation under §1060 applies to qualifying asset acquisitions, not automatically to every stock sale.

State Tax Alert: California Nonconformity

California does not conform to the federal §1202 exclusion. California taxpayers generally remain subject to California income tax on gain excluded federally under Section 1202, and this nonconformity requires separate state tax planning.

I. QSBS Acquisition Dates and Holding Periods

a. What Section 1202 Provides

IRC Section 1202 grants an exclusion from federal income tax on a portion of eligible gain from the sale of qualified small business stock (QSBS) held for the applicable period and issued by a qualifying corporation. For stock acquired by the taxpayer on or before July 4, 2025, determined after applying IRC §1223, a holding period of more than five years applies and the flat dollar component of the per-issuer eligible-gain limit generally is $10 million.

For stock acquired by the taxpayer after July 4, 2025, determined after applying §1223, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (Public Law 119-21) applies a tiered regime: at least three years yields a 50% exclusion, at least four years yields 75%, and at least five years yields 100%. The flat dollar component of the per-issuer eligible-gain limit for that stock is $15 million, subject to inflation adjustment for taxable years beginning after 2026 and the same-issuer coordination rules in §1202(b)(4). Eligible gain first is capped at the greater of the applicable dollar limit or 10 times the aggregate adjusted bases of the issuer's QSBS disposed of during the taxable year; the applicable exclusion percentage then applies to that limited amount. Separately, the corporation's issuance date controls the gross-assets ceiling: stock issued after July 4, 2025, uses the $75 million threshold, while stock issued on or before July 4, 2025, uses the $50 million threshold.

For older stock, the ordinary exclusion percentages are generally 50% for stock acquired after August 10, 1993 through February 17, 2009; 75% for February 18, 2009 through September 27, 2010; and 100% for September 28, 2010 through July 4, 2025, subject to the applicable requirements and special rules. Stock acquired after July 4, 2025 cannot yet have completed its new three-year period as of this article’s September 2026 review.

Gain left taxable solely because of §1202’s percentage limitation enters the special up-to-28% capital-gain category under §1(h)(4) and (7), subject to the applicable netting and tax computation. That treatment is distinct from gain above the eligible-gain cap. Do not automatically model every unexcluded dollar at either 20% or 28%; separately assess any applicable NIIT and vintage-specific AMT rules. See the §1(h) capital-gain computation.

b. Domestic C Corporation Requirement

The stock must be issued by a domestic (US) C corporation incorporated under US law. A Mexican parent company holding US subsidiary stock does not qualify; the US subsidiary itself must be the issuer. Under §1202(d), aggregate gross assets equal cash plus the aggregate adjusted bases of the corporation's other property. Property contributed to the corporation, and property whose basis is determined by reference to contributed property, is treated for this test as having basis equal to the contributed property's fair market value at the time of contribution. The applicable ceiling must be satisfied at all times before issuance and immediately after issuance, taking into account the amounts received in the issuance. Stock issued on or before July 4, 2025, uses the $50 million ceiling; stock issued after July 4, 2025, uses the $75 million ceiling (subject to the statutory inflation-adjustment rule for taxable years beginning after 2026).

The corporation must satisfy the active-business requirement during substantially all of the holding period: at least 80% of its asset value must be used in the active conduct of a qualified trade or business, applying the statutory subsidiary, working-capital and other special rules. Whether a US holding company satisfies the active business requirement depends on §1202's specific statutory rules, including the rules applicable to qualifying subsidiaries; a foreign operating company is not simply swept in by consolidation.

Confirm original issuance: secondary purchases generally fail §1202(c)(1), subject to statutory transfer exceptions. Review issuer redemptions under §1202(c)(3) and Treas. Reg. §1.1202-2, including their distinct windows, thresholds and exceptions; corporate status and holding period alone do not establish QSBS. See the §1202 requirements.

c. Eligible Shareholder Limitation

Only non-corporate shareholders claim the Section 1202 exclusion: individuals, trusts, and estates qualify; C corporations, partnerships, and S corporations do not. Foreign tax characterization may create planning complications, but Section 1202 eligibility turns on the US federal tax requirements for QSBS; foreign classification alone does not automatically destroy the exclusion. Contributing U.S. corporate stock to a foreign entity requires separate recognition, classification and §1202 exchange analysis; do not assume the original-issuance and holder requirements survive a proposed restructuring.

However, pass-through entities (partnerships and S corporations) may hold QSBS, and their individual equity holders may claim a pro-rata Section 1202 exclusion on their share of gain from the entity's sale of QSBS, provided the individual held the pass-through interest continuously from the date the entity acquired the stock. Eligible gain is limited by the pass-through interest held when the entity acquired the stock, which the taxpayer must hold continuously until disposition; a later increase in that interest does not enlarge the cap.

d. The Timing Problem: Why Pre-Exit Structure Matters

If a business was operated as an LLC or partnership, the QSBS analysis upon conversion to a C corporation is fact-specific. In a typical §351 incorporation, §362 generally gives the corporation carryover basis in contributed assets. Section 1202 overlays two separate fair-market-value rules: §1202(d)(2)(B) treats contributed property as having basis equal to fair market value at contribution for the issuer's aggregate-gross-assets test, and §1202(i)(1)(B) provides that the shareholder's basis in stock received for property other than money or stock is not less than the fair market value of the property exchanged for Section 1202 purposes. Section 1202(i)(1)(A) treats that stock as acquired on the exchange date. Thus, a long-held LLC interest does not by itself supply a pre-conversion QSBS holding period; the stock's Section 1202 acquisition date is the conversion exchange date.

e. Excluded Businesses Under IRC §1202(e)(3)

Certain businesses are excluded from QSBS eligibility under IRC §1202(e)(3), regardless of the corporate structure or asset tests. Excluded businesses include professional services (health, law, engineering, accounting, consulting, financial services, brokerage), banking, insurance, farming, mining, hotels, restaurants, and athletics. A technology consulting firm deriving 85% of revenue from consulting services and 15% from software licensing may still fail the active business requirement. The analysis of whether primary revenue triggers the exclusion is fact-intensive. Review the business before issuance and throughout the relevant holding period. Later changes do not automatically cure prior defects; eligibility history and the “substantially all” requirement need fact-specific analysis.

f. Working Capital and the Separate Real-Property Limit

Section 1202(e)(6) provides a working-capital rule, while §1202(e)(7) imposes a separate limit on nonbusiness real property. Under §1202(e)(6), qualifying working capital and specified amounts expected to be used within two years may receive active-use treatment. After the corporation has existed for two years, no more than 50% of its assets can qualify as active solely under this rule. Under §1202(e)(7), no more than 10% of the corporation's asset value may consist of real property not used in the active conduct of a qualified trade or business. These provisions are technical and tied to specific statutory requirements. The particular asset composition and whether specific holdings satisfy the thresholds require careful factual review rather than reliance on general assumptions.

Apply the separate §1202(e)(5)(B) portfolio test: for a period in which non-subsidiary corporate stock or securities exceed 10% of asset value net of liabilities, the issuer fails the active-business requirement for that period, except for assets covered by §1202(e)(6). This net-value test differs from the 80% active-use and 10% nonbusiness-real-property tests; assess the holding-period consequences separately. See the §1202 requirements.

II. Non-US Founders and Cross-Border Ownership Traps

US-Mexico overlay. A Mexican founder holding 100% of a US C corporation faces cross-border structuring risks: (1) if a foreign (Mexican) holding entity is interposed above the US C corporation and US persons hold interests in that foreign entity, subpart F CFC rules may apply to those US shareholders; and (2) a shareholder's NRA status may affect their US tax consequences and ability to claim the exclusion, but it does not make a US corporation fail the Section 1202 domestic-corporation requirement. Real documentation (board resolutions, stock certificates with issuance dates, basis records) becomes essential.

Parallel structures (US C corporation to Mexican holding company to founder) add complexity. The U.S. issuer’s gross assets must be measured under §1202’s specific rules, including controlled-group aggregation where applicable; a parental guaranty does not automatically combine the parent's assets with the issuer's assets for §1202 gross-assets testing, though the overall structure requires careful analysis.

Cross-Border Withholding on QSBS Gains

For Mexican founders or family offices, FIRPTA withholding may apply only if the stock sold constitutes a US real property interest, such as stock of a US real property holding corporation, subject to the applicable FIRPTA rules and withholding rates. FIRPTA does not generally apply to all sales of QSBS by foreign holders. Additionally, the §1202 exclusion operates only for US federal income tax purposes - Mexico has no equivalent QSBS exclusion; other Mexican share-sale regimes require independent examination - and it does not eliminate Mexican income tax on worldwide gains for Mexican tax residents. A Mexican founder resident for Mexican tax purposes may be subject to Mexican tax on the taxable gain as computed under Mexican domestic law, regardless of the federal §1202 exclusion; the §1202 exclusion does not automatically control Mexican tax treatment. Dual-jurisdiction coordination is necessary to address US and Mexican tax outcomes and to structure the transaction in light of withholding and each tax system's recognition rules.

III. The Exclusion Caps and Thresholds

The eligible-gain limits vary based on the taxpayer's acquisition date, determined after applying §1223. The issuer's aggregate-gross-assets ceiling, by contrast, varies based on issuance date.

For stock acquired on or before July 4, 2025: the amount of eligible gain that may be taken into account under §1202(a) generally is limited to the greater of (1) the applicable $10 million dollar limit, reduced by the prior same-issuer eligible gain specified in §1202(b)(4)(A), or (2) 10 times the aggregate adjusted bases of the issuer's QSBS disposed of during the taxable year.

For stock acquired after July 4, 2025: the amount of eligible gain first is limited to the greater of (1) the applicable $15 million dollar limit, subject to inflation adjustment and reduced under §1202(b)(4)(B) by specified prior-year same-issuer eligible gain plus specified current-year eligible gain from same-issuer stock acquired on or before July 4, 2025, or (2) 10 times the aggregate adjusted bases of the issuer's QSBS disposed of during the taxable year. The 50%, 75%, or 100% exclusion percentage then applies to the eligible gain within that limit. The $15 million figure therefore is not itself a promise that $15 million will be excluded at the three- or four-year tier.

These limits are applied on a taxpayer-by-taxpayer basis.

The practical benefit of Section 1202 varies materially based on basis, holding period, gain amount, and the issuer's ongoing qualification. Modeling from actual capitalization records rather than simplified assumptions is generally advisable.

Section 1045 replacement-stock deferral

A taxpayer other than a corporation may elect §1045 for eligible gain on QSBS held for more than six months and purchase replacement QSBS during the 60-day period beginning on the sale date. Recognized eligible gain is the lesser of the realized eligible gain or the positive excess of sale proceeds (amount realized) over qualifying replacement cost not previously used under §1045. The rule does not defer ordinary-income gain. Deferred gain reduces replacement-stock basis; holding-period and election requirements also apply. This defers gain rather than retroactively creating a §1202 exclusion. See the §1045 rollover rules.

IV. Installment Sales and Deferred Payment Structures

Eligible deferred-payment sales may qualify under §453. Classify equity, notes and earnouts separately; equity may be a current payment rather than deferred consideration. Publicly traded securities, dealer dispositions, recapture, related-party transactions and contingent payments require separate analysis. Installment treatment defers eligible gain rather than eliminating the underlying tax.

a. Mechanics and Interest Charges

Under Section 453, if a seller receives at least one payment in a taxable year after the year of sale, gain may be reported using the installment method. The seller recognizes a pro-rata portion of gain in each year as payments arrive.

Section 453A can impose interest on deferred tax attributable to qualifying installment obligations above the statutory $5 million aggregate threshold. Its transaction thresholds, exclusions and computation rules matter; pledging an installment obligation can also accelerate recognition under the applicable rules. Do not apply the headline threshold without testing the actual obligations.

b. Coordination with QSBS

Installment treatment does not create an additional per-issuer QSBS exclusion. Determine the applicable exclusion and installment-year reporting together before finalizing the note. However, deferring gain recognition into later years may reduce the seller's tax bracket in those years or provide time for reinvestment strategies.

US-Mexico overlay. A Mexican buyer financing a sale may structure the note for both US and Mexican tax treatment. US law uses Section 453 installment treatment; Mexico may require immediate recognition. Determine the seller’s filing requirements in each country from tax residence, source, U.S. trade-or-business/ECI or FIRPTA exposure, treaty positions and the transaction. Deferred payments do not by themselves establish filing duties in both countries. Mexican tax counsel coordination is essential.

V. Opportunity Zone Deferral (Section 1400Z-2)

IRC Section 1400Z-2 allows an eligible taxpayer to defer the recognition of capital gains if an amount up to the eligible gain from a sale is invested in a "qualified opportunity fund" (QOF) within 180 days. For legacy investments, deferred gain is generally included no later than December 31, 2026 or an earlier inclusion event. For investments after December 31, 2026, the amended regime generally uses a rolling five-year inclusion rule and a 10% five-year basis increase, enhanced to 30% for qualifying rural funds. IRS Notice 2026-40, §4 permits a qualifying timely investment in 2027 to use the new regime even for eligible gain realized in 2026, subject to the notice’s transition conditions and all other requirements.

a. Basis Step-Up at 10-Year Hold

For a qualifying QOF investment held at least 10 years, the taxpayer may elect the applicable fair-market-value basis adjustment. For amounts invested after December 31, 2026, a sale before the investment’s 30th anniversary uses fair market value at sale; otherwise, the adjustment uses fair market value at that anniversary. Recognition of the originally deferred gain is a separate step. The election, investment horizon and separate deferred-gain inclusion should be modeled together.

b. Limited Availability for Non-US Residents

Section 1400Z-2 is not restricted to US citizens or residents as such; eligibility turns on whether the taxpayer has eligible gain subject to US federal income tax and meets the statutory and regulatory requirements. However, many Mexican residents and non-US persons may not have US-taxable gain to defer, limiting practical availability. Cross-border planning that relies on Section 1400Z-2 must verify that the investor satisfies the statutory requirements.

VI. Post-Exit Charitable Strategies

When liquidity occurs without advanced planning, charitable contribution techniques can still recover tax value.

a. Donor-Advised Funds

A qualifying contribution of appreciated securities to a donor-advised fund may produce a deduction, subject to property characterization, holding period, valuation, substantiation, percentage limits and applicable 2026 rules, including the contribution floor. It is not an automatic immediate fair-market-value deduction. The sponsor has legal control of the donated assets; the donor retains only permitted advisory privileges. A contribution after the donor has a fixed right to sale proceeds can leave sale gain taxable to the donor under assignment-of-income principles.

b. Charitable Remainder Trusts

A charitable remainder trust (CRT) allows the founder to contribute appreciated assets before the donor has a fixed right to sale proceeds, receive annuity or unitrust payments for life (or a term), and leave the remainder to charity. The CRT must be established and funded before the transaction is effectively closed; assignment-of-income principles apply if the donor contributes assets after the sale is substantially certain. The founder may qualify for an income-tax deduction based on the present value of the qualified charitable remainder interest, subject to applicable eligibility, substantiation and deduction limits. A CRT is generally exempt from current income tax on its sale of appreciated assets, but the realized gain is tracked under the Section 664 tier system and may be carried out to beneficiaries in later distributions. Distributions to the income beneficiary carry out the trust's income character under the tier system of IRC §664, which may include ordinary income, capital gains, and tax-exempt income in that order. At death or termination, the remainder passes to charity.

VII. Forensic Tax Basis Review and Pre-Close Documentation

Reconcile shareholder stock basis separately from the target’s inside asset basis. Depreciation generally reduces adjusted asset basis; it does not generally create shareholder stock basis. The transaction form and applicable elections determine which basis affects the seller’s gain.

In a stock sale, the seller's taxable gain is generally determined by stock basis, not the target's inside asset basis, unless a particular transaction structure or election (such as §338(h)(10)) makes asset-level basis relevant. However, for asset sales, a forensic review of the target's tax records (depreciation schedules, prior asset sales, intangible purchases, goodwill amortization) can uncover basis that reduces taxable gain. The buyer's purchase price allocation (required under IRC Section 1060 for applicable asset acquisitions) must be reconciled with the seller's reported gain. Substantiate the seller’s adjusted basis independently. For an applicable asset acquisition, report consistently with the governing purchase-price allocation rules. Engaging tax counsel and a qualified tax preparer far enough in advance of closing to test basis assumptions, purchase-price allocation, and documentation is generally advisable.

VIII. Coordination with Mexican Tax Counsel

US-Mexico overlay. A Mexican founder exiting a US business may have filing obligations in both the US and Mexico for the sale year, depending on residency, source, ECI/FIRPTA status, withholding posture, treaty positions, and transaction structure. Mexico generally taxes residents on worldwide income, but classification, basis and any applicable exemption or special regime require separate examination; departure alone does not establish nonresidence. Relief from double taxation is determined by the interaction of the treaty and each country's domestic foreign-tax-credit rules, but coordination is essential. Determine the seller’s filing requirements in each country from tax residence, source, U.S. trade-or-business/ECI or FIRPTA exposure, treaty positions and the transaction. Deferred payments do not by themselves establish filing duties in both countries. The treaty's capital gains provisions (Article 13) specify primary taxing authority; treaty relief may be available depending on the nature of the gain, residence, limitation-on-benefits provisions, sourcing, and each country's domestic relief mechanisms. Mexican counsel must review the transaction structure for withholding and reporting.

IX. Pre-Exit Structuring: Why Timing Matters

Timing considerations are fact-specific and should generally be evaluated in light of the transaction structure, exit horizon, and applicable tax rules. Before a transaction is substantially certain, Section 1202 qualification can be verified, basis tested, and compensation structures evaluated for tax efficiency. After closing, planning typically focuses on deferral strategies, charitable techniques, and coordination across jurisdictions. Structural changes after a sale is substantially certain cannot retroactively create eligibility for prior periods, and any post-transaction benefit depends on the actual acquisition date, holding period, and satisfaction of the applicable statutory requirements.

Common Questions

When should QSBS planning start?

QSBS planning should start before stock is issued and well before a sale process begins. Eligibility depends on facts that must be true at issuance and during the holding period, so late-stage cleanup may not cure earlier defects.

Is QSBS useful for Mexican resident sellers?

First determine the holder’s U.S. tax status and whether the particular gain is subject to U.S. federal income tax. Mexican tax residence does not by itself establish U.S. nonresident-alien status. Where no U.S. tax applies to the gain, §1202 has no U.S. tax to eliminate. Where gain is taxable, the exclusion requires full issuer, holder and holding-period qualification. Mexico’s taxation of worldwide income, basis and available relief remains independent; a U.S. exclusion does not create a foreign-tax credit. The combined benefit depends on the actual taxpayer and transaction, so obtain coordinated U.S. and Mexican advice.

What documents help support a QSBS position?

Useful records include stock issuance documents, capitalization records, gross-asset testing support, active-business evidence, entity classification history, shareholder ownership records, board approvals, and transaction documents showing how and when the stock was acquired.

Are charitable strategies simple after a cross-border exit?

Charitable strategies can be powerful, but cross-border residency, asset location, deduction rules, timing, and Mexican tax treatment can change the economics. The strategy should be modeled before assets are transferred or sale documents are signed.

Why does pre-close timing matter for post-liquidity planning?

Many planning techniques depend on ownership, valuation, documentation, and transfer timing before a transaction is binding or substantially negotiated. Once a sale is imminent, tax and legal flexibility may narrow quickly.

Related Insights

If you are planning around liquidity and founder tax consequences, you may also want to review our insight on QSBS traps and opportunities and our article on U.S. estate tax exposure for Mexican nationals. Readers approaching a liquidity event should consult a lawyer licensed in the relevant jurisdiction.

This Insight is provided by Hiro Law for general informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal, tax, investment, or other professional advice and should not be relied upon as such. No attorney-client relationship is created by your receipt of or access to this material. The information contained herein may not reflect the most current legal developments and is not guaranteed to be complete, correct, or up to date. You should not act or refrain from acting based on any information in this Insight without first seeking qualified counsel licensed in the relevant jurisdiction(s). Each cross-border transaction, investment, and compliance matter involves unique facts and circumstances that require individualized analysis. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Post-Liquidity Tax Planning and Qualified Small Business Stock: Structuring Before and After the Exit